ResearchBuzz also notes the (recent) launch of Scholarpedia, which strives to be a peer-reviewed, scholarly version of Wikipedia.

A random comparison of the term "fuzzy sets" (SP) and (WP) suggests that the new and improved version might be just that - an improvement.

Now let's see if they can generate a critical mass even remotely akin to the original. It's a bit light on content now (especially for social scientific concepts).

No comments: